Daily Archives: June 1, 2005

The orgy of fourth estate self-congratulation over the “revelation” of one Mark Felt as “Deep Throat” of “Watergate” fame shows no sign of abating 24 hours after what should have been a back-of-the book footnote was splashed across the “mainstream” media with the relentlessness of Paris Hilton’s hamburger ad campaign.

Journalists See More to Story Than Secret Source claims the Los Angeles Times, “They say that anonymity was key in Watergate, but that investigative reporting goes deeper.”

About as deep as a birdbath, actually.

The long-awaited revelation of the identity of “Deep Throat” should remind journalists and a sometimes-skeptical public of the crucial role anonymous sources can play in revealing wrongdoing in high places, an array of reporters and writers said Tuesday.

The Washington Post confirmed Tuesday that W. Mark Felt, a former No. 2 official at the FBI, provided much of the crucial information that helped unravel the Watergate scandal that brought down President Nixon.

Many journalists said that Felt’s high government position, his intimate knowledge of his subject and the fact that his pronouncements repeatedly proved true all made a powerful case for the value of unidentified sources.

Well no it didn’t. Mark Felt (what perfect name for a sock puppet !) wasn’t a primary source of information for Woodward and Bernstein, merely a device for confirming the validity of information they had complied the old-fashioned way.
And what they actually did in putting that story together bears little resemblance to the clown show that passes for “investigative journalism” today, where “reporters” like “Spikey” Isikoff get “leads” about presidential blow-jobs and the ever-so-editorially-protected Judy Miller is given the “lowdown” on Saddam’s mythical Weapons of Mass Destruction by anonymous operatives in baseball caps.

So we’ve gone from “Deep Thorat” to “Curveball” in a few short years. And we need more of this?

But those reporters and writers said Deep Throat’s legacy would be incomplete if their colleagues were to forget the rest of the Watergate story. Washington Post reporter Bob Woodward built stories on White House corruption not only through shadowy meetings with Deep Throat in a parking garage, but also by working with partner Carl Bernstein to review reams of documents and to interview dozens of sources over many months

And “the rest of the story” is that Bernstein has ben reduced to a punchline about swans in a Meryl Streep movie, while Woodard has gone on to become the Beltway’s biggest whore, dutifully “reporting” BushCo propaganda 24/7.

“Deep Throat and the whole Watergate story really galvanized journalism,” syndicated columnist Molly Ivins said. “I would lecture all these kids who wanted to be investigative reporters and tell them, ‘Think about what it’s like to sit in a room for hours looking at old insurance company annual reports. Because that’s what it’s really like to be an investigative reporter. It’s not all romantic and glamorous.’ ”

Still, Ivins and other reporters said they thought the unveiling of Deep Throat’s identity should help readers understand the use of anonymous sources. They said that reminder was particularly important in the wake of Newsweek magazine’s recent retraction of an anonymous report about alleged desecration of the Koran. The report was blamed for setting off deadly anti-American violence in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

It should make them understand that anonymous sources aren’t selfless idealists, but tools as I have been at pains to explain, and when you’re burned by them the proper thing to do is burn back. !

“This is a perfect example of why, sometimes as a reporter, you would be willing to fly in the night — perhaps a little in the dark — with someone because you take them very, very seriously,” said David Halberstam, an author who shared the 1964 Pulitzer Prize for international reporting for his newspaper coverage of the Vietnam War. “Sure, anonymous sources can be abused,” he said. “But every once in a while they are simply mandatory … for a democracy to work.”

Was democracy working when Gerth and Risen fingered Wen Ho Lee?

Journalism schools saw applications and interest in investigative reporting soar after the Post’s reporting on Watergate and its depiction in the book and movie “All the President’s Men.”

Ben Bagdikian, former assistant managing editor for national news at the Post, said many U.S. newspaper editors of that time suddenly agreed to free reporters to spend weeks or months looking into government corruption.

“It was a stimulant in a positive sense. It made investigative reporting an important item on the agenda of many newspapers — to get into serious stories in depth,” said Bagdikian, who later led the Graduate School of Journalism at UC Berkeley. “But in too many cases, it was a superficial imitation of the Watergate reporting, and on insignificant parts of local government.”

while significant parts of national government were left free from all but the most intrepid. And for those brave few there was a heavy price to pay — as Gary Webb learned the hard way.

Onetime Nixon aide and former New York Times columnist William Safire said writers invoked unnamed sources too often, and sometimes needlessly, in the years after Watergate.

He staged his own form of rebellion when former Secretary of State Henry A. Kissinger would give background information on foreign policy. Safire recalled that he would identify Kissinger as “an administration source with a heavy German accent.”

Ever so clever!

Leonard Garment, Nixon’s White House counsel and onetime law partner, said Tuesday that he also had misgivings about using anonymous sources, and not just because his 2000 book had concluded that Deep Throat was Republican strategist John Sears.

“For 30 years we have had the pursuit of wrongdoing in high and low places, sometimes to good effect and often to bad,” said Garment, who lives in New York and is aiding an effort to open a jazz museum in Harlem. “And often that’s had the unfortunate affect of a diminution of trust in government that was undue.”

Deep Throat’s legacy, he said, “is very hard to summarize simply in terms of gains and losses. Like most things, it’s more complicated.”

Indeed it is, but not for the reasons Garment suggests. Indeed Felt’s far from honorable CONTELPRO past, and non compis mentis present, lead one to the inevitable conclusion that his children, longing to transform their ailing father into a secular saint, have “come forward” with a piece of information not at all unfamiliar to “Watergate” historians — and a very large bucket of whitewash.

In recent times, some newspeople have called for ending or sharply curtailing the use of anonymous sources. They point to low public trust in the media and say that could be improved by eliminating secret sources.

But Kathleen Hall Jamieson, director of the Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania, said the objections should be more narrowly targeted at anonymous sources that proved to be wrong.

“Deep Throat told the truth,” said Jamieson, co-editor of “The Press,” a recently released collection of essays. “It’s good when people tell the truth and uncover massive government corruption. That’s not a problem at all…. That’s a great model.”

“Deep Throat” told some truth, not all.

The danger comes when journalists try to take shortcuts, Jamieson said.

“The model is not: Find a Deep Throat and win a Pulitzer,” she said. “The model is: Think about … how a complicated system works and then over a long period of time, through a very difficult process, figure out what’s possible and what’s not possible.

“That, in turn, can lead to an understanding of how the government is flawed and how you can make improvements to fine-tune democracy.”

Those “flaws” have resulted in unnamed sourcing being the primary means of disseminating disinformation and propoaganda. And dealing with that fact requires a commitment to truth far more absolute than any “Throat” however “Deep” is either willing or able to provide.


Trackback Ping(s)
Who Is W. Mark Felt?
Excerpt: Man Who Admits to Being ‘Deep Throat’ Breaks His 30-Year Silence
Weblog: Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator
Tracked: June 1, 2005 01:07 PM