Looks like Senator Sippy-Cup
is a Marxist
No not that kind — THIS kind
When asked by Fox News Sunday host Chris Wallace if his filibuster threat on background checks meant that he would also vote against the final Manchin/Toomey bill, Rubio said,“Well to be fair, I haven’t read it in its totality, but I can tell you this, I am very skeptical of any plan that deals with the Second Amendment because invariably these gun laws end up impeding on the rights of people to bear arms who are law abiding and do nothing to keep criminals from buying them. Criminals don’t care what the law is.”
Rubio also added that we shouldn’t be focused on guns. We should be focused on violence.
How in the world does a sitting United States Senator prepare for appearing on all five Sunday shows and not read the legislation that is currently being debated in place where he works?
What are taxpayers paying Rubio to do?
A shame Jacques Derrida isn’t around to answer such an essential metaphysical question.
Though he may have been loathe to do so.
a fortiori the real question before our allegedly “free press” is why so much enegry is being expended on pimping this Low Normal Latino to a public with virtually no interest in him.
Could it be that our press isn’t “free” at all but rather in increasingly transparent cahoots with the Repubican National Committee?
Clearly Rubio can’t explain himself. Happily Professor Wagstaff can do it for him.