The Beard


Yes that’s what Chuck Todd has had the unmitigated gall to title his book about President Obama. Wondering why, I trust?

The original The Stranger was written by Albert Camus who said —


Being “on the side of the executioners” is Chuck Todd’s occupation
as this review in The World’s Worst Newspaper inadvertently discloses.

For his inaugural program this September as moderator of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Chuck Todd landed a big guest: Barack Obama. If the president reads Mr. Todd’s new book “The Stranger,” it’s hard to imagine him wanting to return to the program anytime soon. The book delivers a stinging indictment of his presidency so far, one underscored by this week’s elections, which resulted in huge gains for Republicans and are widely seen as a repudiation of Mr. Obama and his policies.
In these pages, Mr. Todd dissects “the promise versus the reality of Obama” and concludes that he will be regarded, at least in the near future, as “a president whose potential wasn’t realized.” He writes that “income inequality is worse than ever,” that the Middle East could well be “more unstable when Obama leaves office than when he took it,” and that while he “wanted to soar above partisanship,” his tenure in office will likely “be remembered as a nadir of partisan relations.”


The underlying problems Mr. Todd diagnoses have already been pointed out by many reporters and politicians, especially in the run-up to the midterm elections. Those problems include what critics see as Mr. Obama’s passive leadership and lack of managerial experience; his disdain for, but inability to change, politics as usual in Washington; and his reluctance to reach out to Congress and members of both parties to engage in the sort of forceful horse trading (like Lyndon B. Johnson’s) and dogged retail politics (like Bill Clinton’s) that might have helped forge more legislative deals and build public consensus.

Translation: “He’s just so UPPITY!”

Mr. Todd acknowledges the challenges the president faced entering office: a tottering economy, two wars inherited from the Bush administration, and an obstructionist Republican opposition. But he suggests that Mr. Obama was frequently his own worst enemy, allowing his temperamental inclinations (his detachment, his caution, his impatience with the often-irrational aspects of politics) to hobble the implementation of his vision of transformative change. Mr. Todd goes so far as to write that “Obama’s arrogance got the better of him,” and chides him for an unwillingness to apply the necessary elbow grease to make progress on difficult issues like gun control and immigration.

“Elbow Grease.” How vivid.

The overall picture that emerges here is that of a highly insular and centralized White House that is reluctant to listen to outside experts, prone to cutting cabinet members out of the loop and unable or unwilling to learn from its mistakes.

One is understandably “reluctant” to deal with a lynch mob.


Though he writes in workmanlike, utilitarian prose, Mr. Todd, who is also NBC News political director, has grounded his arguments in hundreds of interviews with Washington sources and his intimate knowledge of how that city works or (more often, these days) fails to work. Many of his conclusions echo the reporting of other journalists (like James Mann and The New York Times’s Mark Landler) and observations made by former administration insiders (like the former defense secretaries Robert M. Gates and Leon E. Panetta).

Who, like Todd, are on the side of the executioners, having abandoned the President like rats leaving a sinking ship — even though the “ship of state” is steadier than ever thanks to Barack Hussein Obama.

If many of this book’s overarching arguments will be familiar to those within the Beltway, “The Stranger” nonetheless provides the lay reader with a brisk, if depressing overview of the Obama White House, while giving Washington insiders plenty of colorful new details.
In contrast to Bob Woodward with his I-am-a-tape-recorder approach, Mr. Todd does not shy away from analysis, which mostly proves revealing, though it can tip over into the speculative. For instance, citing unnamed “circumstantial evidence,” Mr. Todd suggests that Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s opposition to “almost every troop increase the Pentagon proposed” for Afghanistan might have been part of a “good cop/bad cop” routine: that is, “The president needed someone to take another position in order to rein in the Pentagon” and Mr. Biden filled that role.

“Circumstantial evidence” pertaining to the crime of Being President While Black

The book’s one gaping hole — and it’s significant — has to do with Mr. Todd’s hop-skip-and-jump approach to Mr. Obama’s handling of the Iraq war. This volume fails to grapple seriously with how the White House’s eagerness to exit that war (and failure to make a concerted effort to persuade the prime minister at the time, Nuri Kamal al-Maliki, to make a deal regarding United States troops) helped set the stage for the rise of the Islamic State today. There is also scant attention paid to many national security issues, including the N.S.A.’s surveillance programs, the growing reliance on drones in the war on terror, and redactions made to a Senate committee’s report on the C.I.A.’s detention and interrogation program.

Let’s fill that “gaping hole” — shall we?

Of the president’s flip-flops on Syria — initially leaning toward limited military action (after concluding that President Bashar al-Assad’s forces had used chemical weapons against their own people) then deciding to back away and seek approval from Congress — Mr. Todd writes that here was one of the few times that many of his advisers “quickly and vociferously disagreed with their boss.” Mr. Obama announced his change of mind after taking a walk with his chief of staff, Denis R. McDonough, who, Mr. Todd notes, had also been one of the dwindling number of aides skeptical of arming the Syrian rebels.

“quickly and vociferously” they objected to taking orders from a Negro.

Like Mr. Gates and Mr. Panetta, Mr. Todd points to this administration’s proclivity for trying to centralize decision making in the White House. He writes that as secretary of state, Hillary Rodham Clinton felt that Mr. Obama’s White House, in Mr. Todd’s words, “tended to micromanage American diplomacy to an extent unprecedented in previous administrations,” adding, “It’s one of the undertold stories” that “the Obama national security team sometimes treated Clinton almost as a figurehead, and they certainly drove policy and the agenda.”

Hillary as Beltway Nanny.

As for the administration’s handling of the Arab Spring, Mr. Todd reports that Mr. Gates, Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Biden all believed — and were hoping — that Egypt’s longtime president, Hosni Mubarak, would survive the 2011 protests against him; they worried that without him the country could spiral “into the unknown.” But Mr. Obama, writes Mr. Todd, sided “with his younger staff” (including Mr. McDonough, Susan Rice, Samantha Power and Benjamin J. Rhodes) “over the more seasoned principals,” and told Mr. Mubarak that he needed to step down.

So nice to see him “side” with the young.

Egypt would, in fact, begin to spiral downward: Last year, military officers removed the country’s first democratically elected president, Mohamed Morsi and suspended the constitution; its new leader, Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, has presided over a highly repressive regime, jailing political opponents and cracking down on dissidents (acts that in turn have threatened to radicalize civilians). Mr. Todd reports that a prominent, recently retired Democratic senator argues that the Obama White House made a “fundamental policy mistake” in “getting involved in Egypt, which led to Libya then Syria,” and sending mixed messages to the Middle East.

Much of this book focuses on domestic policy and politics, including a stale chapter about Mr. Obama’s 2012 campaign. Mr. Todd uses the roller-coaster story of the administration’s health care plan as a kind of window into both its ideals and dysfunction. He contends that as a candidate Mr. Obama pledged himself to speedy and concrete action on universal health care “almost on a whim,” needing a way, in an early 2007 speech, to differentiate himself from his Democratic primary opponents, Mrs. Clinton and John Edwards.

“Almost on a whim”? THE AFFORDABLE HEALTH CARE ACT IS A “WHIM”????!!!!!!

Although several top Obama aides like Rahm Emanuel cautioned against rushing into health care as the administration’s first big initiative (as opposed, say, to financial regulatory reform), the president decided to push ahead. The process would bog down in Congress and only barely squeak through after a nerve-racking year.

That was quite a “squeak” as the sound of it is still reverberating.

The rollout of health care reform would become a public fiasco when the site went live in October 2013 with systemic problems. For three years, outside advisers had been warning about technical challenges and the need for managerial accountability, Mr. Todd reports, but a self-absorbed White House allowed turf battles, politics and simple inertia to lead to continued delays. “Like some of the administration’s other missteps,” he writes, the website disaster, “was rooted in poor management, in this case not designating someone, anyone, to own implementation.”

How about you, Chuckles?


It could have led to your regarding the President more sympathetically, vis-à-vis “seeing yourself in him” so to speak.


or maybe not.

The troubles with health care, combined with a cascade of other crises — the rise of the Islamic State, an increasingly chilly relationship with Vladimir V. Putin’s Russia and the Ebola epidemic in Africa — have further wounded the White House, creating the impression of a reactive, even flailing administration. Republicans racked up big wins in this week’s elections in no small part because of Mr. Obama’s growing unpopularity.

According to exit polls, nearly six out of 10 voters expressed negative feelings about his administration.

Stoked by our “Free Press.” And I’m not talking FOX.

Some of the dysfunction that came to be associated with Mr. Obama’s tenure, Mr. Todd says, “was forced upon” him, and “some of it came from him.”

Did you report on the former Chuckles? Of course not. You were too busy carrying water for them and blaming everything on Obama.

“If a huge reason for the failure of Washington to get anything done is a focus on means instead of productive ends,” he writes, “Obama’s struggles came from his focus on ends to the exclusion of productive means.”

Barack Obama in the White House
By Chuck Todd
Illustrated. 518 pages. Little, Brown and Company. $29.

The FaBlog Faithful surely know what’s coming next.

Leave a comment